SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mcmab who wrote (162727)6/28/2005 12:28:42 PM
From: economaniackRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: punitive damages- How shocking would it be if AMD did not ask for punitive damages? Seems like the case for direct harm is compelling and with triple damages already takes us well into 11 digits

As an AMD investor I would be perfectly happy with $20 billion and a court order that Intel offer consistent pricing across all customers.

e



To: mcmab who wrote (162727)6/28/2005 12:29:36 PM
From: TGPTNDRRespond to of 275872
 
mcmab, re: I don't see a summary judgment by Intel, maybe AMD. >

There will be no summary judgement.

This one will slog thru the courts like the INGR case did.

That one started, IIRC, in ~'95 and ended last year.

By the time it was over INGR had lost the division they started the case to protect.

And got less then, IIRC, $1/2 B.

JIMHO.

-tgp


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News