Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (63837)	6/29/2005 2:04:57 PM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 81568

Re: "There is no evidence that Salman Pak was used to train terrorists." Of course there is. The testimony of two defectors, and the photographs of the fuselage. The link I provided named 5 corroborating sources, and also noted the fuselage was probably Russian (which is a big "so what?" for me). I don't hear Rush much, and when I have, I have never heard him mention this evidence (but I suppose he would have). In my estimation, the administration never did speak of this evidence because it is NOT proof, just a hell of an indicator to those of us who are aware of it. Maybe you'd like to speculate that the administration knows the defectors concocted seeing Saudis training on the fuselage....but we do know that Salmon Pak contained a fuselage, and I find no evidence that the place wasn't a training camp. We have no official word that Atta did not meet Al Ani of Iraq, in Prague. The Czech Government still says so, and your notion that the CIA debunked this meeting is false, this notion being based on "unnamed sources," rather than official information from the CIA. Rumsfeld "isn't sure" if the meeting took place, though we once accepted the Czech report. We do know Atta went to Prague in 2000, and no one claims to know what he did on that trip other than that went there just prior to his arrival in the U.S. Dan B.