Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TechieGuy-alt who wrote (162828)	6/28/2005 6:25:32 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

I'm sure they already have a lot of evidence already lined up. They wouldn't file something like this without it. I suspect HP is okay with it, and I'm almost certain Acer is in AMD's camp.

To: TechieGuy-alt who wrote (162828)	6/28/2005 6:58:09 PM
From: kpf	Respond to of 275872

TG It'll be interesting but credible witnesses will be key. Well, the formal witnesses in this case are the actual plaintiffs. AMD, the formal plaintiff, is a proxy for these. As those collusive games are usually played to assure there is plenty of evidence, witnesses and all for the claims. Probably everybody involved knows the game. Intel sure does, and will communicate it to the judge and jury if necessary. I just thought there is a need for some counterbalance for all that populistic pathos in the PR-piece titled "Complaint". It's just business. Just to prevent from any misunderstanding: I am not at all condemning AMD for filing the complaint the way it did. Hector better is no choirboy competing with Intel. I wish him luck with it - if only for counterbalancing reasons. K.