SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (34602)6/29/2005 1:00:47 AM
From: Elroy JetsonRead Replies (4) | Respond to of 306849
 
The improper usage of hedonics is made most clear by one fact.

Hedonic adjustments have never once been used to increase the price of any product which has declined in quality. Apparently we live in the best of all possible worlds where everything always improves.

Tomatoes used to be red, ripe and delicious. They were replaced with flavorless pink tomatoes as hard as a potato -- the CPI declines. No Hedonic adjustment necessary.

Red ripe tomatoes are again available, in addition to the pink tomatoes - but these are a luxury product which are not tomatoes for the purposes of the CPI. Only the pink tomatoes which previously replaced the red, ripe tomatoes are tomatoes.

As the general quality of American products declines, the CPI in moderated by the same amount. But when a product is "improved" a Hedonic adjustment is made.

Many autos are no longer large enough to include a spare tire, so it is replaced by a self-inflating tire good for 300 miles. This "improvement" is an excuse to Hedonically lower the car's price by some amount like $500. Why would anyone buy a tire good for 35k miles when they can pay only $500 more and purchase a tire good for only 300 miles.

How many more "quality improvements" of this type can we withstand before we are living like the British did in 1968, as reflected in television shows like "Are You Being Served?"
.



To: mishedlo who wrote (34602)6/29/2005 3:29:20 AM
From: unrealistic_thoughtsRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
After a war, there is always a BIG inflation to pay for the war. After we invaded Afghanistan, i bought gold. i managed to buy at the 2-year peak but i've earned 40% on that investment after spending time down 25%.

When there are huge social programs (As the Bush Slash and Burn Tax policy a HUGE SOCIAL PROGRAM FOR THE RICH), then we often get over-extended and create a bigtime inflation.

Both these events are exactly what happened in 1970 : The Vietnam war and Johnson's war on poverty both created huge bills and lit an inflationary fire that would last for 30 years.

Why is that "This time its different" ??

I really want to know, i read Gary Shilling's DEFLATION book in 1998 and believed just about every word in that book. But now i'm starting to have my doubts : deflation, inflation, stagflation, or just muddle through ??