Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (20749)	6/29/2005 12:04:05 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

When does being qualify as a human being and at what point or points is that being entitled to be considered part of human society. The real question is how smart does an ape or dolphin have to be to get some respect around here. The only relevant question about a headless twin is whether the other twin which contained it, wanted it. As a side note was the fact that the decision was made by guardians, which is another relevant subject. TP

To: one_less who wrote (20749)	6/29/2005 3:32:20 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Note to self... I see no reason why we cannot recognise various stages of being from conception on to qualify as a human being, while dealing with the stages and potentialities with consideration of circumstance against the principles of inalienable rights. Mike was headless, yet enabled to live longer and with more esteem than most of his kind. miketheheadlesschicken.org Having a head, not having a head, or having a funny looking one then is only part of the picture.