SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (122577)6/29/2005 2:30:31 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793883
 
i have heard him say that. I think he believes it. Even when i was supporting bush 100% after 9/11 i thought there was something more to iraq than was publicly stated. Saddam did try to kill senior and the failure to take him down in 91 was always a big problem for neocons. The real question to ask rangel and yourself for that matter is whether iraq would have occurred without 9/11???? What do you think?



To: John Carragher who wrote (122577)6/29/2005 5:05:49 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793883
 
<<the typical non responsible kennedy stuff that is careless said to satisfy the left and hurt our military.>>

Somebody should follow Kennedy around with a ball bat and swat him in the head when he says something really stupid. He'd only be a dumb ass twice a year.



To: John Carragher who wrote (122577)6/30/2005 2:43:48 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793883
 
Rangel is a fool to say something like that. How long exactly did it take the UN to put 14+ sanctions on Saddam's Iraq...how many months, and years? Rangel and the idiot Left who say things like that are the very ones that charge that the war in Iraq WASN't planned...now they want it BOTH ways....Planned before, and NOT planned before....

What are Kennedy and Rangel and all the other MoveOn types saying about Saddam training terrorists in Iraq? And paying the suicide bombers families for killing civilians? Or the #2 A-Q guy under bin Laden who has been in Iraq and directing all the terrorists activities for some time now.....

No light from these Dems...just heat and hot air. Where did the smart Dems go?