Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (20761)	6/29/2005 3:49:07 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"Do chickens have inalienable rights and, if so, how do they differ from our own?" Ours: The difference between life and eternal life is but a breath. Chickens: The difference between life and finger lickin' good is an ax.

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (20761)	6/29/2005 4:11:35 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Do chickens have inalienable rights and, if so, how do they differ from our own? I wonder because several of them became buffalo wings last night Cockfighting was illegal in Oklahoma until 1963, when a judge ruled that chickens are not animals and therefore unprotected by anticruelty laws. *Though cockfighting was banned in Oklahoma from 1910 through 1963, until that appeals court judge overturned the ban with that astonishing declaration that chickens are not animals. Most states banned cockfighting back in the 19th century... Is cockfighting no different than raising chickens for food ?