Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (25495)	6/30/2005 10:20:46 PM
From: SiouxPal	Respond to of 362366

You and Raymond make excellent points, just not here in this tent when you don't account for your slams. I account for my mistakes ASAP.

To: American Spirit who wrote (25495)	6/30/2005 10:22:10 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362366

Didn't have to call him a liar. Just had to vote against the war. Nobody political, except maybe Barbara Lee called Shrub a liar. Didn't need to call him a liar to vote against the war. He was amazingly correct about the whole thing... Off the top of my head, I can come up with 20 of us on the SS thread who were a hell of a lot more accurate in our predictions. And he didn't have to stop Bush; he just had to vote against the war. He lost the moral highground with that vote. Nobody remembers who voted for Nam. They only remember the 3 who had the balls to vote against it. Sometime between his appearance at that Congressional committee when he was with VVAW and this election, his balls atrophied.