Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (165157)	7/1/2005 2:29:55 PM
From: geode00	Respond to of 281500

I figure Iran poses two problems: 1. Bush & Co, never rational or competent, will do whatever they darn well please. While we're fighting over someone to replace O'Connor and preserve Roe, they'll be manufacturing a case to bomb, infiltrate or otherwise meddle with Iran. It is odd that the Mayor of Tehran wasn't on the CIA's list of 'people we should know something about' before he made it to the Presidency. I've heard that he's illiterate, knows nothing outside of Iran and isn't in charge anyway. Who knows? It's disturbing that the CIA doesn't know. 2. Iran enriches uranium and starts packing away nukes...like Israel. It may be where Bush & Co's lying meets reality. I thought before that it would be a sad thing if Saddam didn't have WMDs to give up so he couldn't prevent war. I think that it's equally sad if Bush's crying wolf over Iraq prevents the world from understanding that Iran is really able to stockpile nukes. That's all the world needs, two countries with nukes and tons of paranoia.