Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (51461)	7/2/2005 7:17:49 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 173976

You're just plain wrong. Kerry has no imperialist objectives. I know the guy. He abhores imperial presidencies like Bush and Nixon. He is for wars only when attacked and as a last resort. He would have chosen a much more surgical and internationalist option of handing Saddam. Saddam was a menace but not an imminent threat. Kerry would have waited and kept Saddam in a tight box. That said, he would have to protect the oil supplies until such a time as we make the long overdue transition from oil to other forms of energy. To do this, we'll have to pick the lesser of two evils and build nuclear plants to make hydrogen energy. But also lots of other energy choices, like solar panels everywhere. In the meantime, within 5 years let's all try to be driving hybrids, and for now drive less and carpool.