SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ManyMoose who wrote (104116)7/4/2005 12:51:43 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 225578
 
As long as we are represented with people, of character and sound judgement, I do not care whether they are male or female. I am not concerned that is 50% men and 50% female. The qualities of the judges as well as qualifications matter. But, I believe we are off course with the entire # of judges, although some of them have redeeming qualities.

Instead we have a few characters.



To: ManyMoose who wrote (104116)7/4/2005 1:02:43 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 225578
 
Have a great 4th of July!:)



To: ManyMoose who wrote (104116)7/4/2005 1:19:13 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 225578
 
The 'Supreme' fight ahead
Michael Barone (archive)

July 4, 2005

URL:http://www.townhall.com/columnists/michaelbarone/mb20050704.shtml



To: ManyMoose who wrote (104116)7/4/2005 1:24:42 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 225578
 
AT LAW

A Higher Authority
May God save the United States from this honorable court.

URL:http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110006906

BY ROY S. MOORE
Monday, July 4, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT