Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: niceguy767 who wrote (163731)	7/5/2005 6:42:07 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Niceguy Re ..Phuddy is absurd. His line of argument is characterized succinctly here. That is one line of arguments he uses, but you are missing the point. Fudd doesn't care about the truth of his argument, as long as it matches his point of view about Intel. We see it happening in politics. For yrs. the dems. argued deficits didn't matter. Now it is the republicans arguing deficits don't matter. For yrs the dems argued against using the fillibuster, now it is their favorite weapon. Elmer has used the same poor yields theory for yrs, hasn't proven it yet, and he is still using it. He still argues his one million coppermines story was correct, and Intel never paper launches anything. The point is, weigh in with you view, but don't expect Elmer to be persuaded by the merits of your argument. That never happens. On the other hand, you very seldom are persuaded by the merits of others either, so you shouldn't be so surprised that some people never change, as that is their nature.