Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (71402)	7/5/2005 4:15:53 PM
From: Real Man	Respond to of 94695

Well, high-energy neutrons is not something you want in your garage -g-

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (71402)	7/5/2005 4:39:37 PM
From: Casaubon	Respond to of 94695

You have to capture the energy produced, without breaking your machine! That is why using wave/volcanic/earthquake, etc energy is not an easy task. Even if tremendous quantities of energy can be produced, they need to be harnessed successfully or it won't be a viable reactor design. In other words, creating fusion energy is not the limiting factor (we know it can be done). However, capturing the energy for consumption is quite another matter. This what I meant, when I say the limitation is material science.