Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: exdaytrader76 who wrote (20929)	7/5/2005 6:23:42 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Respond to of 28931

"Different versions and different interpretaions agree at least on their monotheism." So, our "state religion" would encompass all monotheistic religions?

To: exdaytrader76 who wrote (20929)	7/5/2005 6:46:36 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 28931

I fail to see how keeping the federal government from entanglement with any religion (and keeping the government from suppression of any religion- as in a ban on religion- like the communists have had) embraces the Wiccan/pagan agenda. I can see how it might embrace the teeny tiny (less than 4%) agnostic contingent in this country but I don't see how it would embrace anyone else, at least not if you mean "embrace" in the sense of getting to put your symbols on government propery, and getting to have your texts displayed in government buildings and such like- and especially not Wiccan/pagans- who might want pagan symbols on the capitol lawn, and governmental naked solstice dancing- if they were truly "embraced" (and that is just not happening). Could you please explain this theory?