Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paret who wrote (165395)	7/5/2005 8:57:34 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<Your Cocaine Bill> Perhaps not a fit drinking buddy for a lying alcoholic draft dodger, but then if the issue is character it is curious to find you engaging in a pissing contest over who is the greater sleazebag, Bush or Clinton. Clinton has some good qualities. I don't see any redeeming qualities in Bush, and the thousands of people who are dead and wounded on his watch are not likely to break out in a chorus of "hail to the chief".

To: paret who wrote (165395)	7/5/2005 10:59:39 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

We cannot prove that Clinton did cocaine. Despite the persistent rumors and evidence it has never been proven. He sexual predator status is another thing. We can prove that he perjured himself about sex. Hillary was effective at crushing the accusers of her husband. She was ruthless in each case of Bill's sexual misconduct. Her private investigator effectively communicated the wishes of Hillary to see the victim suffer much worse fate if they came forward with credible evidence against Bill Clinton.