Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (690428)	7/6/2005 3:32:33 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Assuming Bush gets to replace Rehnquist after O’Conner, maintaining the current balance would require one of his nominations to be a strong conservative and the other more moderate. * * *

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (690428)	7/7/2005 8:24:54 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Interesting thoughts. But what you fail to consider is that the repubs are going to nuke the fillibuster IMMEDIATLY upon use by the dems. Two of the 7 dorks who made the agreement have already said NO PROBLEM. Both Bush's choices will go through. If we are lucky, Bush will get 3. Our constitution is a great document. If it needs changing I want it to happen how it is supposed to. Not ginsberg and friend writing their own laws. They are creepy and unAmerican imo. No stalemate. The dems are in deeeeeeeep trouble. Which is good for America. "Nominating the 'hardest Right of all possible candidates' first would stalemate the Senate --- all other actions would be stopped... perhaps until after midterms."