SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (123769)7/7/2005 9:06:02 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793926
 
"if we know the jihadists are finding sanctuary in iran or syria
bomb them"

Who and where? We cant seem to find them on the ground in iraq, how can we know who we are bombing from the air in other countries? This is why its called assymetric warfare. Only a threat to destroy their holy places might have impact. The England attack is minor compared to 9/11 and i think it will show more about al quaeda weakness rather than strength. We are far from having to bomb them back to the stone age. I think the most important news coming from the attack is whether they used suicide bombers. According to the pundits that requires more infrastructure. Also beware of a second round of attacks before this is all over. Maybe not London but i wouldnt be surprised to hear more bad news over the next several days.



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (123769)7/7/2005 9:08:53 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793926
 
The vast majority of muslims in the ME and Africa are poor and uneducated. They do what the Mullahs tell them to do, five times per day. They are opinion robots whose primary source of knowledge comes from their mosque visits, five times per day. They have no incentive to ever question a cleric's sermon and therefore no motivation to ever rise up and stop the barbarism that takes place in the name of Islam.