SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (240485)7/7/2005 7:39:41 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571405
 
re: Since you weren't for "turning the other cheek" in Afghanistan ( Message 21180179 ), what makes you think the terrorists would have left Spain and the UK alone had we confined our "nation-building" to Afghanistan?

What makes you think they wouldn't have? BTW, Afghanistan was "nation destroying", as was Iraq. That part went OK, the "nation building" part has really not gone well.

As a true conservative understands, nation building is not our prerogative, it's not within our capability, and it's not moral. Self-determination is the ultimate bedrock of conservative belief. Period.

John



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (240485)7/8/2005 7:15:51 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571405
 
Yeah, maybe London can follow Madrid's lead and pull out of Iraq.

You might have noticed that I have not advocated for even the US to pull out of iraq in my late posts.

Since you weren't for "turning the other cheek" in Afghanistan ( Message 21180179 ), what makes you think the terrorists would have left Spain and the UK alone had we confined our "nation-building" to Afghanistan?

It would not matter. The fight was justified in Afghanistan...Iraq is a most unfortunate and costly sidetrack. A huge presidential blunder.
Costly to me = shattered and lost lives, national and world division, loss of international influence, recruitment gift to terror, and more.

Al