SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (17998)7/7/2005 9:20:02 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
so now you are saying ...

I did not change my story. I wouldn't use the term liberal because not all four of the justices who supported elections were liberal. but yes, she was told by them that they would go public with her deliberations in the Bush/Gore case, which were entirely based on not wanting Gore to pick her replacement. This would have been a scandal, and she delayed her retirement to avoid the scandal.

TP



To: Brumar89 who wrote (17998)7/7/2005 11:24:40 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 20773
 
Yes,yes,yes..next caller...next caller..you are on the air..

cornelwest.com

Funny basic two-party dilemma, that fundamental US founding father one..

Pale brother, you are in deep pale diarreah stuff... but that is nothing new..
(however, it is expected to take a 5-7, maybe even 25 decades, extrapolated
data from US)

It could be even 200 decades..

fcc.gov



To: Brumar89 who wrote (17998)7/8/2005 2:49:13 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 20773
 
Excuse me, (young brother), you with the pants sagging.

Retiring with 16A3, or 47?? (it actually works, despite the pants)

world.guns.ru

Be cruel with your history, there is your possibility.

cornelwest.com

selfdestruction, cruel aspiration..

The returning vietnam-vets wa salready tough, and the pants are now sagging even worse.

150, 250 or 250 years to get US evolving past the two-party system??

we too did it for two short decades in the late 1700s, funny stuff, we still have fun, celebrate it every summer.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (17998)7/8/2005 3:08:19 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 20773
 
Please try to keep them clean..

Some say it is the happiest pants you ever had.
(SA agrees, although they are about to beat you)



To: Brumar89 who wrote (17998)7/8/2005 3:15:55 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 20773
 
You could, but you didn't, now it is only sagging pants.

Why didn't US upgrade the funny 2-party system, already in the 1930s??
(late 1800s was obviously too much to ask)

Be cruel to your history, there is your (only) possibility..

I always did believe US and UK were really cruel, voluntary blood and fertilizer??
No single bloody drop nor droppings, then nor now..

Why did it go so wrong??