Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SiouxPal who wrote (165520)	7/8/2005 2:04:23 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'm not sure I buy the argument that the attack on London helped the war. The attack on Spain did not after all. I think many view the attack on London as proof that Bush's argument about Iraq absorbing terrorists attacks and thereby preventing them on US or allied soil is bogus. Train of thought: Iraq has terrorist attacks every day Iraq isn't preventing terrorism Iraq may be promoting terrorism Iraq may be exporting terrorism People are getting wiser and more impatient.

To: SiouxPal who wrote (165520)	7/8/2005 9:54:51 AM
From: Keith Feral	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

This is the ultimate expression of liberal arrogance. Now, the left is going to blame our own leaders for the planting of the bombs. Not only did we have it coming, but the government planted the whole scenario. Boy, this new level of denial that Westerners deserve to die at the hands of the Muslim radicals is a really disturbing move by the left. Do yourselves a favor and keep these opinions to yourselves if you are out in public.