Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (21047)	7/8/2005 1:02:53 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 28931

parallel between the Dred Scott decision and your position that the unborn are not Legal persons There are differences as well as parallels. One has been born and the other has not. Would lynching a black man be wrong if He was your property and it were legal to do it? No, but then the obvious question is why? It is not because he is black. It is not because he is a man. It is not because he was classified as property. It is because he is self aware. You can see that this is the correct analysis if you ponder the similar question Would turning off the resparator of a brain-dead person of any sex or color be wrong?. Human rights don't go to chemicals, they go to consciesness. TP