Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (690922)	7/8/2005 10:50:58 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

A human life is a time line, not a moment in time. That life starts at conception. That life is allowed it's right to life or not. In the Schivo case, man's law dictated or found that a husband could speak for the wishes of another person, a wife, if that person could not speak for itself. Whether that wife was FUNCTIONALY DEAD or not was not at issue really. The question was about determining the wishes of that life concerning it's medical treatment. A fetus in the womb is simply dependent on another specific human for a part of the time line of that human life. After birth for several years it will be dependent fully on other humans to survive. At birth a human life simply stops being dependent on a specific human for it's continuation. I cannot comprehend why a fetus in womb is not human life. The current state of every human life at one time was a human life in a womb. In the Schivo case, the autopsy revealed that indeed she was FUNCTIONALY DEAD and thus the video that conned so many was a fraud as I had early on proffered. To me the law of God that joined a MAN AND WOMAN gave a husband a presumed right to speak for his wife in this kind of situation without question. The law's of man put safeguards in place and they were followed and the law of man then allowed the morality of the law of God to be followed. The husband spoke for his wife. The autopsy revealed The husband's belief that indeed his wife was gone were correct all along. But many good people were fooled by the fraud and ignorance of Ms Schivo's other family. That one person voted for kerry proves that fraud and ignorance can fool and decieve. In the kerry case that fraud, the lies were intentional.