Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (21055)	7/8/2005 7:53:51 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

<<<How much genetic damage does one have to have in order to justify killing it?>>> "It is not for me to draw those lines. It is between the woman and her doctor." Your answer is entirely circular. You don't draw the same conclusions about Susan Smith do you? Why not? <<<So stages of development are enough to dis entitle one to "Inalienable Rights"?>>> "I would certainly say that a brain and a nervous system are prerequisite." Yet you continue to support a Woman's right to kill an unborn child well past that stage, even half way through actual birth. Why is that? How does three inches change the ontological essence of the unborn from tissue, to a Human being with full rights? PBA is nothing more than the legal killing of innocent Human beings. There are no valid medical reasons for it and unless you support the "right" to kill other disabled children after birth you are simply being dishonest.