Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (240540)	7/9/2005 4:31:51 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572152

Re: Why didn't they hit the USA ? That would make more sense if we were gonna blame it on Iranians Because that would amount to overkill... US and Israeli insiders are well aware that there's no need to shanghai the US into attacking Iran. Contingency plans thereof have been wargamed ever since the hostage crisis of November 4, 1979. Pentagon freaks such as Gen Boykin are raring to settle score with the Iranian mullocracy. The US, however, can't go it alone... US and Israeli warmongers know that it's gonna be a mess even worse than Iraq if Britain doesn't join. The risks against US interests will rise as a result of poor intelligence sharing, etc., etc. Hence the current, reckless, strategy of "toughening" Britain or, in other words, Israelizing British public opinion. The impending war against Iran must be sold as a just, retributive crusade against a terrorist Iranian regime that supports terrorists in the UK.... Gus