SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (164317)7/9/2005 7:00:51 AM
From: niceguy767Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
"It is interesting to follow the FUDsters"

Now that the AMD suit is out in the public forum, it's as if an "election campaign" process has clicked into place, with both sides doing their utmost to sway the vote.

Like you, I read the isuppli comment as very thin in its factual basis but very thick in its rhetoric. isuppli obviously is feeding very well off the existing status quo would be my assessment.

As Sudhian has already stated, AMD's SC is an easy to read standalone document with any number of specific examples of alleged violations by INTC of several different laws. The isuppli response chooses to ignore the many allegations and jump to its harebrained and undeveloped conclusions.

Does phuddy write isuppli's scripts for them? (You know, "harebrained" and all.) ;-)



To: Joe NYC who wrote (164317)7/9/2005 12:16:03 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Speaking of FUD

It will be no minor task for AMD to make Dell tell the truth

How do you know what the truth is? Ahhh I know... AMD said it, you believe it. Case closed.

I guess Intel will claim victory no matter what the outcome is, as as Intel did in Japan, pleading "no contest" inside the courtroom, and "not guilty" outside the courtroom

Courtroom? I know it's a difficult thing to accept but it never got to court Joe.