SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (691299)7/11/2005 1:30:37 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Who cares about the (possible) personal motivations of any of the actors in this little episode?

What difference would any of that make to the larger, more important question: was the administration correct when they told the American public (and the world, at the UN) that 'Saddam was actively seeking uranium in Africa'?

Since the administration has subsequently *withdrawn* those words (not to mention the various separate actions debunking the source documents as frauds...), and admitted their conclusions were incorrect, then I believe there is no longer any dispute over the fact that what was claimed was false.

The larger issue of national interest trumps minor personal matters everytime.



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (691299)7/11/2005 1:38:01 PM
From: ThirdEye  Respond to of 769667
 
I'm not going to argue point by point with you about this. It's either going to get sorted out or not. But your writer is a little self-serving with some of the facts, such as when or how Wilson could have known the documents re Niger were fake. They had already been called fake by the UN well before the CIA publicly agreed. So Wilson didn't need to have seen a CIA report before calling them fake himself. And once again, even if leaking Plame's name was for the purpose of impugning Wilson's credibility, somehow that purpose was not accomplished. The act has backfired.