SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (165788)7/11/2005 2:41:43 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Well I don't know any terrorists myself so I can't tell what their reasons are and what they are after. Presumably CIA analysts in charge of terrorist groups do. That aside, I am fairly familiar with the modern history of a good chunk of Asia, including ME. Michael Scheuer's views are dead on the money as far as how US is viewed in the ME. In a somewhat oversimplified way, you can see that US support of corrupt regimes who killed and imprisoned any viable alternative political movements has only left the most radical hardliner elements to survive, which is who we are dealing with today. Presumably if more moderate and independent oppositions were to rise to power, fewer people would have reasons to join terrorist groups. Furthermore terrorists are primarily concerned with changing the regimes of their own countries. Their attacks on US and UK are along the lines of "friend of my enemy is also my enemy".