SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ild who wrote (35800)7/11/2005 11:39:13 PM
From: CalculatedRisk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
They are making two mistakes:

First, the B/D model is BEFORE the seasonal adjustment, so it hasn't accounted for 96% of the jobs created.

Second, the B/D model is only for the most recent months. The BLS revises each month twice, and during the revisions they remove the B/D numbers and replace them with actuals. So the B/D is not cumulative.



To: ild who wrote (35800)7/12/2005 1:35:21 AM
From: CalculatedRisk  Respond to of 110194
 
ild, I was half wrong:

The B/D count is not updated with each revision.

Q: Do the birth/death factors vary from first preliminary to final estimate?

A: The birth/death factor for a given month does not change between 1st preliminary, 2nd preliminary, and final estimates.

bls.gov

But I was correct about the rest ...

Q: Can I subtract the birth/death adjustment from the seasonally adjusted over-the-month change to determine what it is adding to employment?

A: No. Birth/death factors are a component of the not seasonally adjusted estimate and therefore are not directly comparable to the seasonally adjusted monthly changes. Instead, the birth/death factor should be assessed in the context of its effect on the not seasonally adjusted estimate.

Contrary Investor was comparing B/D to SA numbers. That isn't correct, B/D is a component of NSA numbers.

You made me go read about it again!