SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (8656)7/12/2005 3:56:34 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 12465
 
SEATTLE MAN ORDERED TO PAY OVER $230,000 FOR FRAUDULENT STOCK TRADING USING STOLEN AND FALSE IDENTITIES

sec.gov

The Commission announced today that it has obtained a final judgment
against a Seattle day-trader, Suheil M. Judeh (Judeh), who used stolen
and false identities to engage in fraudulent stock trading. The
judgment provides that Judeh, age 37, is enjoined from violations of the
antifraud provisions of federal securities laws and must pay
disgorgement and penalties totaling $234,121.

As alleged in the Commission’s complaint, Judeh’s scheme operated as
follows: During 2002 and 2003, Judeh used stolen and false identities
and forged checks to open a series of brokerage accounts (nominee
accounts). He then used the nominee accounts and an account he held in
his own name to trade securities with himself. Judeh structured the
trades so that he gained over $100,000 in trading profits, while the
nominee accounts incurred corresponding losses that were ultimately
borne by the brokerages where those accounts were opened. Also, Judeh’s
trades were publicly reported and thus created a false appearance of
legitimate market activity in the stocks involved.

The final judgment permanently enjoins Judeh from violating Section
17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The judgment further
requires Judeh to pay disgorgement of $114,121, representing his profits
from the scheme, and a civil penalty of $120,000. [SEC v. Suheil M.
Judeh, Civil Action No. C 04 0322 L (W.D. Wash.).] (LR-19299)