SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (18092)7/13/2005 12:00:38 PM
From: Bucky Katt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20773
 
Because all hospitals are serial overchargers... What we are starting to see in this country is the rotten side of greed, greedy capitalism.......



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (18092)7/13/2005 6:57:22 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 20773
 
I thought $40,000/kid was the cost, excluding especially pre-natal care and all the rest smart stuff.

However, considering the risk of possible post-natal stuff, a
pre-natal divorce is really smart for some.

It takes some true guts to plan for emergency stuff..



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (18092)7/13/2005 7:00:07 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 20773
 
Btw, it is US-cheaper to use a lot of eggs, instead of
first one, then two, and only then maybe 3-4 or even 8.

Another possibility might be to clean up the enviroment,
increase the quality of sperm (too), as well as the size.

Even twins might become just as rare as they were.

OK,OK, those great agressive women, reducing the production
of shrink-wrap food might also make them happier??
(larger breasts too, instead of just on the males)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News