Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (21199)	7/13/2005 7:46:44 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

It is not for you to judge whether I, or anyone else would be better off dead than in the circumstance they find themselves in. There are thousands and thousands of people who want children but cannot have them. Adoption would be a "better" alternative to killing innocent Human beings, but then that would be inconvenient, and we would never want to inconvenience anyone would we?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (21199)	7/13/2005 8:23:47 PM
From: exdaytrader76	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

It is better that they not be born Now you are talking like a fundamentalist. They say it's "better" to be born than to die. How radical. Why are third trimester abortions virtually always illegal? It's just a fetus, right? In fact, an expecting mother could just wait until her water breaks and go to the abortion doc instead of the hospital. It should be her Constitutional right to healthcare to kill that baby, I mean "fetus," because it's HER BODY HER CHOICE. Until it comes out on its own, it's just a clump of cells, right?