Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (52542)	7/14/2005 12:18:01 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Frankly I prefer the Offensive Department. Maybe we would be less likely to go to war if we had to constantly call on the Offensive Department. Hmm. The Cato Inst was saying that the world oil supply is fluid and easily accessible as long as you can pay for it. The only way another country could deny us oil is if they blockaded every US port. So, what, they're saying that even an argument that oil is a national security issue is bunkum? I don't know if it's true but it sure denies the admin yet another excuse for invading Iraq: China was going to get its hands on that oil and crash our economy. It was part of a discussion on the China-Unocal thing where he stated that Unocal was such a small part of the entire oil market that....who cares if China buys it.