Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (21208)	7/14/2005 3:23:19 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

<<<It was you that said partial birth infanticide was justified>>> "I said NOTHING about infanticide. You do not know what it means, so I will help you (as always)" "INFANTICIDE: “The act of killing an infant.”" So it doesn't count as an infant because it does not travel that last three inches and besides; the scissors are thrust into the skull of the tissue blob while it is still inside the birth canal. This is simply semantics nothing more "The parents should be seen by two health professionals, THE WHAT???? "be recognised as equal partners in all decision making processes regarding their baby." THEIR WHAT?????? "Making the decision to Terminate" Parents deciding to kill their baby "INFANTICIDE: “The act of killing an infant.”" Case closed