Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (241592)	7/14/2005 11:43:12 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580042

Speaking of "unnamed Democrats," watch as the Dems try to get another David Souter nominated by "Borking" every nominee put forth by Bush. A virtual unknown when he was nominated and confirmed by Bush Sr., Souter turned out to be one of the most liberal members of the Supreme Court. Diabolical those democrats...almost as clever as rove... Al

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (241592)	7/14/2005 1:33:40 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580042

I think you'll see some senate republicans lose their primaries for their parts in going along with the democrats...

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (241592)	7/14/2005 3:59:59 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1580042

Steve, an unnamed democrat would win.... Speaking of "unnamed Democrats," watch as the Dems try to get another David Souter nominated by "Borking" every nominee put forth by Bush. A virtual unknown when he was nominated and confirmed by Bush Sr., Souter turned out to be one of the most liberal members of the Supreme Court. You guys will never get it......what you consider normal is unconstitutional; hence, any nomination Bush makes is going to look "liberal" to you. The problem isn't with your nominees, its what goes on in your heads. ;~) ted