SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (241648)7/14/2005 1:51:36 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571885
 
More diversion.



To: steve harris who wrote (241648)7/14/2005 2:34:46 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571885
 
"argue with this..."

Easy enough.

1) Non-answer from Cheney. Wilson did not claim that Cheney asked that he be personally sent to Niger. He claimed that Cheney's office sourced a request that the CIA verify those claims. Now Joe also thinks that Cheney himself and not just the office sourced that request. The CIA verified that they sent Joe, although Tenet says it was done at a lower level than he.

2)Joe said he believed that the report was passed on to senior administration. Others claim it wasn't. Not sure what this was supposed to prove, but...

3) It might be true that his report was lacking. However, Condi herself has stated at least once that the belief of the yellow cake in the Niger was in error.

The Butler Report stated that it is credible that Iraq tried to source yellow cake. It also states there wasn't any credible evidence that they actually did. Much the same as Joe concluded.
news.bbc.co.uk

I could go on. Much of this hammers on extraneous points or uses only partial information. None of it addresses the fact that Rove outed a covert agent for petty political reasons.



To: steve harris who wrote (241648)7/14/2005 4:41:45 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571885
 
argue with this...

gop.com;

LOL. This GOP disclaimer is fast becoming quite the joke. I am surprised you even brought it up. Its already been refuted by one post today.