Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: techguerrilla who wrote (52830)	7/15/2005 5:05:31 PM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 173976

I'm surprised the New York Times is standing behind Judith Miller so strongly. I think this is going to change as it begins to understand that she was nothing more than a chimp administration stooge. Of course that would mean the New York Times will have to acknowledge that they were just the distributors for a chimp administration stooge with no editorial competence. I'm not sure they are ready to admit that yet. TP

To: techguerrilla who wrote (52830)	7/15/2005 6:11:11 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

The NYTimes is a stooge for this administration. It had a chance to come clean and fire Miller and her editors for inability to get a story straight. It fired Blair for making up stories and the editor and publisher (if I remember correctly) both resigned over that mess. Miller didn't make up stories (who knows) but certainly wrote up and vouched for other people's made up stories. I don't see any difference between the two. The rightwing went ballistic over Dan Rather and the Bush Desertion memos and they STILL can't prove that Bush did his duty. Why hasn't the opposition demanded Miller's firing?