Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (125644)	7/16/2005 5:00:19 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793866

We'd call it a maintenance contract. Yes, and that's why the "M" in HMO stands for, well, you know. There are some inherent conflicts of interest in HMOs, basically the capitation plan takes a set fee from everyone, and you might use far more than you paid for, or far less. Whatever is left over, the doctors get to keep, so there's an incentive to do less and keep more, in which case the patients suffer. With regular health insurance, the incentive is to do too much, in which case, the premiums go up or the insurance company goes broke. I don't think Kaiser has ever run the risk of going broke. Oddly, because the premiums are far cheaper than Blue Cross, Blue Shield, but the co-pays are also far cheaper. Could be that paying for preventive maintenance actually pays off. I pay $10 for a regular visit (even for annual physical), $20 for a specialist, nothing for a hospital visit or surgery, nothing for x-ray, ultrasound, or lab, $10-$20 for generic drugs, $40 for drugs still under patent. No deductible, just co-pay.