Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (165814)	7/16/2005 2:26:09 PM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

I'm not the person to answer that question Translation: No.

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (165814)	7/16/2005 5:15:07 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

I asked for your opinion, and you refused. let Congress change the rules, but not retroactively The LePage case changed the rules in the US in 2003 and the JFTC case changed the rules in 2005. Intel is living in the past. Petz

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (165814)	7/16/2005 7:27:27 PM
From: brushwud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Intel's team of anti-trust lawyers thought it was legal when they instructed Intel how to structure their contracts. How people here can be so dumb as to think Intel acted in a vacuum is beyond me. The contracts were structured by the best legal experts in the business. You remind me of a losing Football team arguing about a certain formation in the middle of the game. The leading team was told it was legal but you are arguing if it should be legal. You want the game stopped and points awarded to you so the game will be "fair". If you don't get at least a 30% Score Segment Share then you're sure the other team is cheating. I think you will find out that the "formation" was perfectly legal and like it or not Intel played by the rules. If the rules turn out to be unfair in the true sense of the word then let Congress change the rules, but not retroactively. It's more like the Intel band assumed victory and was parked in the middle of the field and then you complain when the game is extended due to a foul on the last play.