Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (21297)	7/17/2005 3:20:15 PM
From: exdaytrader76	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

will he adopt random children You pro-death (er, pro-"choice") people are supposed to be the intellectual ones, right? But all logic seems to break down with you: Premise #1: I am Pro-Life Premise #2: You are not Conclusion: I must agree to support all children on the planet. huh?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (21297)	7/18/2005 3:04:47 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"That would be a necessary requirement if he wants to force them to be carried to term." Not at all, I don't need to adopt every victim of the Holocaust in order to object to it on moral grounds.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (21297)	7/20/2005 9:29:53 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Yes--one assumption of his "argument" is that an unwanted fetus is wanted (valued) by somebody. The proof of that on a personal level would be to undertake the care of the abnormal fetus until it dies--whether that be before or after birth. The proof of that on a social level would be to advocate and support the social collection of tax money sufficient to the care and support of ALL averted abortions--not merely nationally, but worldwide. Human Beings are surely a larger set than mere citizens.