Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (125889)	7/18/2005 10:04:04 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793718

I think you are right. At that time the CIA wasnt even supposed to be involved in matters in the USA and now we learn they were trying to influence OUR OWN DAMN ELECTION. jdn

To: John Carragher who wrote (125889)	7/18/2005 10:16:59 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793718

"i wonder how the work atmosphere is at cia for mrs. plame?" I suspect the cold shoulder treatment she may be receiving has inflamed her. "I wonder who signed off on this mission?" If he was called a diplomat, it must have been a state department mission. Did it have an element of not so open and official to it? The state department is ripe with liberals and Democrats. They might have just signed off without looking beyond the agency recommendation. "I wonder who in cia forwarded this investigation to justice department, certainly they knew at cia if she was undercover or not?" In the case of spies it is better to be safe than sorry. IMO the "investigation" is a creature of Joe Wilson's craving for publicity. "i think the cia has a lot more problems than we are aware of." That is probably always true. After five years under a President who allows the CIA director t brief him, it is probably getting better.