Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (242127)	7/19/2005 11:05:56 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575154

Victim ordered to wed rapist By Shaikh Azizur Rahman July 19, 2005 BOMBAY -- Hard-line Islamic clerics in a northern Indian village have declared that a woman's 10-year-old marriage was nullified when her father-in-law raped her -- and ordered the mother of five to marry the rapist. The fatwa, or religious edict, was issued by Darool Uloom Deoband, South Asia's most powerful Islamic theological school known for promoting a radical brand of Islam that is said to have inspired the Taliban in Afghanistan. The decision has outraged both Muslim and Hindu leaders and prompted a fierce debate that has dominated the front pages of national newspapers across India. The fatwa ordered Imrana Ilahi, 28, to separate from her husband and treat him as her son because she had sex with his father. "She had a physical relationship with her father-in-law, and it nullifies her marriage," said Mohammad Masood Madani, a cleric at the theological school. He said it made no difference whether the sex was consensual or forced. The village council then decreed that Mrs. Ilahi would have to marry her father-in-law. Feminists and liberal Muslims reacted with fury, staging nationwide street protests. But Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mulayam Singh on June 29 supported the fatwa, saying: "The decision of the Muslim religious leaders in the Imrana case must have been taken after a lot of thought. ... The religious leaders are all very learned and they understand the Muslim community and its sentiments." The rape took place June 4 in the village of Charthawal in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, when Mrs. Ilahi's husband, Noor Ilahi, was away. When Mr. Ilahi, a brick kiln laborer, learned of the attack, the village court instructed him to divorce his wife. But Mr. Ilahi, 32, told his wife: "My father is dirty and you are clean. I still love you and I cannot desert you." Mrs. Ilahi, with her husband and five children, sneaked out of Charthawal and took shelter in Kukra, the village of her parents. Mrs. Ilahi received another rude shock when the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, the country's most influential Muslim umbrella organization, endorsed the punishment meted out by Darool Uloom Deoband. "The fact that the woman was 'used' by her husband's blood relative makes her [unclean] for her husband and there is no way she can be allowed to live with him," the law board said. Page 1 of 2 next » \| Email \| Print \| Subscribe

To: combjelly who wrote (242127)	7/19/2005 11:12:28 AM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1575154

re: And that would be the essence of justice in my mind. Karma... John

To: combjelly who wrote (242127)	7/19/2005 1:18:50 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575154

Cooper being questioned about welfare reform on July the 11th could very well mean that Rove is going to a BBQ in his honor, but not for outing Plame. If that is the case, then there are a lot of administration people who have smoke pits with their name on it. And that would be the ultimate in irony, an administration that looks down on the reality-based and making a career out of spin being hoisted on that particular petard. I don't understand your meaning. Why would Rove get burned for talking about welfare reform? ted