Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: haqihana who wrote (126127)	7/19/2005 1:45:30 PM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793927

he stopped because all of the eu etc was against taking out saddam... good thing his son didn't listen to them.

To: haqihana who wrote (126127)	7/19/2005 3:19:57 PM
From: Andrew N. Cothran	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793927

You mean, like his son, GWB?

To: haqihana who wrote (126127)	7/20/2005 1:25:37 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793927

Andrew, Bush 41 felt that he had to bend from the pressure being put on him by the UN. That is the only reason he stopped Stormin Norman from burying Baghdad. He should have told the UN the get the hell out of America, and shut up. Nah, I don't believe it. Bush 41 wanted to get rid of Saddam, but he had no stomach for an occupation of Baghdad. Nation-building was definitely not his thing. So when the Saudis told him five bazillion times that Saddam was mortally wounded and would fall in a few months (they said this in public too), he believed them.