Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (57062)	7/19/2005 1:18:50 PM
From: Mike McFarland	Respond to of 57584

1. I agree especially with the idea that taxes should be higher on gasoline. 2. I think it would be a very good idea if biodeisel was used only for stinky buses. 3. We should conserve! The only nanotechnology that interests me for the moment is this stuff: nature.com You can PM me a cool nanotechnology link if you promise to read that page;-) I do like the idea of harnessing solar and wind energy. Ethanol and biodeisel are probably not the right way to do it.

To: Rock_nj who wrote (57062)	7/20/2005 10:24:12 AM
From: Bucky Katt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

If, as you postulate, that our military is little more than a petroleum protection service, and with the recent record high prices per barrel of crude oil, they aren't doing a very good job, are they? I agree with wind & solar and a few of the other hybrid sources in the works, but the ethanol debate does not hold any weight for me, it is a taxpayer supported gift to ADM and the farm states... I should also note I have held ADM shares for over 20 years. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em! admworld.com