Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (29159)	7/19/2005 4:18:13 PM
From: SiouxPal	Respond to of 361213

I seriously could not get the spunk to fight for him. I'd sit back and spectate.

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (29159)	7/19/2005 4:26:46 PM
From: techguerrilla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361213

The Democratic Party needs to hurry up and define itself ..... .......... With buffoons like Biden and Hillary operating, the Party is losing touch with the left entirely. I'm not saying the left has to rule the Party, but its significance needs to be recognized. Extremism is going to kill the Republican Party. Watch the chimp try to ram a right-wing freak through the Senate while his policies in Iraq are a joke and the unmasking of Rove takes place. The Republicans will live to regret this bout with extremism. Kerry took the left for granted. Biden's simply an idiot getting some stage time. I just wonder who will restore the strength of the left in the Democratic Party. Dean was a good man, but even Kerry helped destroy his validity and, with it, the left. The chimp's ability to use fear and paranoia to legitimize his insane policies strikes me as nothing short of mindboggling. To get fools like Biden to help make his ridiculous policies bipartisan in nature takes the Democratic Party down with the chimp when the eventual evacuation from Iraq occurs. Democrats have to stop challenging the chimp over tactics and start mouthing the position that the invasion of Iraq was stupid and that they were hoodwinked by nasty positions such as not supporting the chimp was unpatriotic. What crap! This clown's running the country in to the ground. /john

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (29159)	7/19/2005 4:45:53 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 361213

How dumb do they think we are? _______________________________________ WASHINGTON (Creators Syndicate) -- In my line of work, you get lied to a lot. There are the generally forgettable fibs, like a senator who's making his seventh political trip to New Hampshire since the first of the year insisting he has made no decision about a White House run. The falsehoods you remember are bold and brassy. I will never forget President George H.W. Bush stating with a straight face that the nominee's race had never even crossed his mind when he picked Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court. Presidential candidate Bill Clinton demonstrated early his flair for fiction by contradicting all his campaign's previous statements on his non-service in the military when he admitted that, yes, during the Vietnam War he actually had received a draft notice calling him to military service. Why had Clinton never mentioned this fact before during the endless Q-and-A sessions about his military record? In a polygraph-punishing explanation, Bill Clinton lamely explained he had just "forgotten." Let's be clear: If you were a young man of draft-eligible age during Vietnam, you might be excused for forgetting your first kiss or your first beer. But you would forever remember that ominous moment when the letter, carrying with it the full force and power of the U.S. government, arrived summoning you to bear arms. So, too, did George H.W. Bush fully understand that his nomination of Clarence Thomas, an African-American jurist of modest legal achievement, would discomfort and demoralize many Democrats. Today in Washington, the big, barefaced lie is very much back. For two years, the George W. Bush White House had asserted that Bush's closest political advisor, Karl Rove, had nothing to do with press leaks revealing that the wife of the former U.S. ambassador whose report had publicly refuted administration claims that Saddam Hussein had attempted to buy "yellowcake" uranium ore from Africa for nuclear weapons was an undercover CIA officer. Scratch those assertions: Karl Rove did tell Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper that former Ambassador Joe Wilson's wife worked at the CIA. A senior Bush administration official told The Washington Post that, shortly after the publication of Wilson's piece in the New York Times -- which undercut the administration's case for launching a pre-emptive war against Iraq -- two top White House officials had called six journalists to disclose the identity and the position of Valerie Plame, Wilson's wife. That same senior administration official said: "Clearly it (the leak 'outing' Plame) was meant purely and simply for revenge." Are you ready for a barefaced lie? Listen to the Republican talking points. It is true that Rove did talk to Matt Cooper. But he was not trying to smear Wilson and thus silence a formidable critic of Bush's Iraq policy. No, Rove's only motive was to make sure that Cooper and Time did not publish something that could turn out to be false. This is a side of the man we have not seen before -- selflessly saving gullible newsmen from publishing anything inaccurate. Imagine how busy Rove must have been during Bush's 1994 race for Texas governor, when his campaign was accused of launching a whispering campaign in East Texas about Democratic Gov. Ann Richards' affinity for gays. Try as he must have, Karl just couldn't stop the circulation of those ugly rumors. In 2000,George W. Bush's campaign was accused of spreading the vicious charge that Bush's main rival, Sen. John McCain, was unstable because of the time he had spent as a POW in isolation. You just know Karl must have been speed-dialing reporters, valiantly trying to kill that slander. In 2004, the man who bankrolled the Swift Boat Veterans against John Kerry was one of Rove's oldest Texas allies. Wayne Slater of The Dallas Morning News, who has covered Rove long and well, puts it this way: "Throughout his political career, bad things happen -- sometimes involving dirty tricks -- to his enemies or rivals." Is that because he's evil? "He's amoral. He doesn't set up a plan to damage, defeat or destroy his enemies because he's evil. He does it because he's so unbelievably competitive and amoral." All of this raises one nagging question: Just how dumb do the Bush people believe we are, that we would swallow, for even a nanosecond, the fabrication that Karl Rove's only motive in calling reporters was to discourage inaccurate stories? Do they really think we are that stupid? Find this article at: cnn.com