SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (242321)7/20/2005 8:31:35 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577883
 
RE: "Answer the question! What's the sexual split of the potential Supreme Court candidates?"

I already did. Within the pool, there are a substantial number of female candidates. This isn't the UK where there are no female judges. Our system is surprisingly packed full of them.

Well you are rapidly disqualifying yourself from the race.

A sexual split is a percentage. The question is not whether there are a significant number of female candidates. If there are 100 female candidates and 900 male candidates, one in ten nominees should be female. Get it?

Do you know the sexual split amongst the potential candidates, or not?



To: Amy J who wrote (242321)7/20/2005 8:32:18 AM
From: Elroy  Respond to of 1577883
 
that proves how much I prefer diversity - even if an opinion is against me. Why else do you think I read this thread - the diversity of opinion is interesting.

well you revel in the diversity, I gotta go the dentist....


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News