SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (242328)7/20/2005 11:44:21 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578028
 
Elroy, the pool of female candidates is very high and the resulting ratio is sufficiently healthy.

For someone who is supposedly a businessperson, you are very surprisingly unable to understand English descriptions of sufficiently large.

Am getting the opinion you are biased against women, because you are more focused on trying to prove there is nothing wrong with having nearly all men on the Supreme Court.

Regards,
Amy J



To: Elroy who wrote (242328)7/20/2005 2:16:39 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1578028
 
Never mind, you don't seem to know the answer to what the sexual split is among experience highly placed candidates for the Supreme Court, so the conversation is a waste of time (for me, at least). I'll just stick my initial thought that you are sexist for thinking Bush should appoint the best woman rather than the best person, and I'm finished.

Go to the dentist!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News