Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : The thread of life -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (768)	7/20/2005 10:28:53 AM
From: Mike McFarland	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1336

It was really a very good quarter for GLGC, I am terribly embarrassed to have traded a winner for a loser...or at least something treading water. Can I fall back on this: When I swapped glgc for more dpii, I traded a company sorting through failed molecules for scraps, for a company that can generate new molecules. And chemical space is so very big. Just want to take the edge off looking like a complete idiot. GLGC has done very well this past quarter. It isn't terribly sexy, but they did snag more stuff for the repositioning service, and that is, to me, the most interesting part of their company. If I were long I'd be singing praises all over the place and making an ass of myself. Instead, all I can do is make an ass of myself. Add a chemistry capability to glgc and do you have a vrtx or a crgn? Or am I just grasping for straws here? Someday I am going to get a PM from Rick or Peter that says "straws Mike" and that will put me in tears. I'm going to grade myself a C+ for trying, but if all that mattered was being right I'd be getting a D in this class.