Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spekulatius who wrote (21716)	7/20/2005 12:58:20 PM
From: bruwin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78660

Yes Spekulatius, I mentioned HANS at $97 because that’s what it’s stock price was when I posted my recent reply to Paul Senior. At that stage it had increased by 20% from about $81 to $97 in 25 calendar days. I thought it pertinent to make the point that a stock should be judged on the merits of its Financial Fundamentals, and not on whether it was considered to be a "gnat amongst giants", or any other similar irrelevant consideration. My reference to HANS’s performance from $10 in Jan.’04 to its current $107.50 was to compare it to TWIN’s performance within the same period. In my opinion, it’s "no contest". Needless to say, you’re entitled to your opinion. To finally close this discussion, let me say that it’s not my intention to try and convince you about what you should buy and why. That’s entirely your own business.