Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (242332)	7/20/2005 11:36:37 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1573682

When man after man is selected, and statistically it is out of whack with the number of candidates, that is why I bring it up. She could never provide any statistics on the sexuality of candidates despite repeated requests. She's pulling a "Ted" and just making up claims like the above to support her sexist view that the candidate should be a woman. I say we ban her!

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (242332)	7/20/2005 11:55:56 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573682

RE: "Perhaps he should have appointed an illegal alien - to balance things out." I don't find value in snide remarks, but prefer intellectual discussions. RE: "If and when he gets another vacancy you may have more of a point." You incorrectly assume my point is about one decision or two decisions. It's about neither. Bush could hire a woman for the next slot, and the statistical problem still exists. My point is about the statistic that's completely out of whack and non-representative. Regards, Amy J