SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (2037)7/21/2005 9:31:26 AM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541703
 
I know you aren't accusing me of that- since you know I live with an entire case of dictionaries, thesauruses, and etymology books next to me. I love words, and believe that the careless use of them can cause not only confusion, but pain. Our words connect us, are our ultimate weapon against alienation. Knowing how someone defines a word is essential before we can even begin to hope to understand them.

This particular discussion had about been exhausted after an entire day and it was fairly clear how each individual interpreted the word protest or terrorism. You seemed to sum it up nicely for the purposes of discussion on this thread- if there were to be one. Maybe the discussion on the words themselves WAS the point. For me, it had reached a sort of repetitive, self-defeating level.
Hmph. Last time I throw a compliment your way.



To: Lane3 who wrote (2037)7/21/2005 10:12:17 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541703
 
I think shorthand sometimes shortchanges. Would you agree that much of the nuance of a thing is lost when people communicate in shorthand? Further, because people's "shorthand" may be quite different, since the meaning attached to the word may vary person to person (just look at how the word "brave" is interpreted by people here), there may be huge differences in meaning between various receivers of the shorthand.